Our topic is “arc lengths for curves given parametrically”. Good news right away: the first display is (or would be were I not graphically challenged unto uselessness… probably oughta get some pencilpad gizmo or something) the drawing—a curve in the plane with line segments connecting a few points—that accompanies the derivation of the main “formula” (in the sense of “memorize this first of course”) for the section at hand (1):

.

The first thing I’d like to’ve said about *that* is that it’s *easier* to make sense of this formula than of something like . This may be a matter of taste but I doubt it. It appears to me that by thinking of the *x* and *y* co-ordinates of a point of the curve as functions of a parameter, we are *removing an artificial asymmetry* that exists in the “*y* is a function of *x*” point of view. By *not even having to ask* which co-ordinate is to be considered “independent” and which “dependent”, we get a *simpler proof* and a more symmetric, principle-revealing, easily generalized thing-of-beauty and joy-forever, formula (1).

The *next* thing is probably along the lines of “this derivation would be well worth looking at even if it were *entirely* review”. Touching various parts of the drawing with chalk or pencil (or in our case, alas, whiteboard marker) while talking about the symbols leads in the best-case scenario to *thinking like a physicist*… one becomes able to perform certain calculations by manipulating some visual-seeming “object” in the time-and-space of one’s imagination. This is something I’m *not very good at*; quite often like the Algebra major I am I’m reduced to *pure symbolism* and have to think of certain combinations of letters (and suchlike symbols) undergoing certain transformations according to rules.

What’s always been clear to me—to my considerable frustration—is that, once one “sees” the meaning of, say (rather than thinking of it as a piece of “code” to be “plugged in” as part of some calculation), a proof like that for the Area of a Surface of Revolution becomes simply an exercise in writing down the obvious.

The “geometric” material in this course was mostly *invented* for the needs of physical science (the study of electromagnetic forces in particular). If you get good at it *now*, probably you could go on to do well in ODE and grab hold of the half of the Program that almost completely eluded me.

(Instant footnote: “ODE” means “Ordinary Differential Equations” in mathmajorese [everybody else says “diff, E, Q”; ugh]—the subject that follows our course in a typical STEM major (Science, Tech, Engineering, Math) and which is typically [but not for me] followed *by* PDE—*Partial* Differential Equations—also known, in math departments, as “Applied Mathematics”. Math for physics, in a word…)

Any new “formula” should be taken for a test drive. In the last lecture, I looked at two problems that somehow eluded me last time… the *line segment* and the *arc of a circle*. These are the *simplest interesting examples*; one habit of mind I’ve found very useful is to *look* for these. I blogged about this idea last quarter in *VME*. Specifically, *I* did *x(t) = t/3*, *y(t) = t/4*, for (the segment connecting the origin to *(4, 3)*… like a beginner I pulled this parametrization out of thin air in my eagerness to apply formula (1)… *today* I’ll probably say some more about how to *find* it…); then I said “here’s a problem from today’s quiz; I’m afraid the class as a whole isn’t ready; somebody do it at the board and I’ll give the whole class full credit”… and put up *x =*cos(*t*), *y=*sin(*t*), and somebody stepped up and did it. Yay, this class.

As it turns out, there are only a few “types” of arc length problem where it’s practical to work out exact answers with paper-and-pencil methods so suchlike basic-example motivation might be even more crucial than necessary. As simple a curve as the parabola is already *brutally tough* for Calc III according to my admittedly very limited understanding: the curve —a textbook problem—requires a tricky substitution in the integral (supplied by a very capable student last week) even in order to transform it into *another* tricky integral, one I blogged about last year.

Then there’s the cycloid (and related curves). And some carefully constructed quadratics, designed so that “middle terms” will “cancel” in a convenient way. And that’s all *I* know. Probably we’ll do one from this last category today. The first exam is Monday…

April 18, 2009 at 2:46 pm

I recently sent you an email asking about the exam coming up. Is there a review sheet for this, or a set of problems we can look at? What sections are covered on this exam?

April 18, 2009 at 3:42 pm

oh. yes. sorry about that.

i take it you’re talking about 153.

my review there was based

at least in part on the exam i used last year.

i use a pretty esoteric program for

typesetting exams & quizzes and haven’t

achieved web-compatibility.

so i’ll just say a little about what to expect.

*set up* an arc length problem.

calculate derivatives for a curve

given parametrically.

and “old” material (eliminate the parameter,

sketch-with-orientation, stuff like that)

from the first two quizzes.

on the sequence-and-series stuff

be able to give the first few terms

(don’t forget *recursive* sequences)

and know the “tricks”…

ln both sides, l’hopital’s rule,

& factor-and-cancel (sequences)

the “n-th term test, “telescoping”,

& geometric series (series), for example.

that we’ve discussed in working out

computations.

we recently looked at “p-series”

and the integral test; you should

get a look at that stuff before

the next lecture but you won’t need it

for the test.

April 18, 2009 at 6:21 pm

Slight difference: PDE was, where I took it, math for mechanical engineers. Really distorted the course. I should take it again in a fluid-flow-free zone.

Jonathan

April 24, 2009 at 3:38 pm

[…] Aspects Of A Topic, Vlorbik on Math Ed argues the case for considering the formula for the length of a curve […]

May 1, 2009 at 8:21 pm

“diff, E, Q”; ugh? Well, if you write it that way, sure. But in my lecture notes I always wrote it “DiffyQs”, which must refer to Qs that aren’t totally diff, but just kinda diffy. My student seemed to enjoy hearing and using the term.

September 22, 2011 at 10:25 am

Guy .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your web site and take the feeds alsoI am happy to search out so many helpful info here within the publish, we want develop extra techniques on this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

February 2, 2013 at 10:42 pm

I’m really enjoying the theme/design of your website. Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility problems? A number of my blog readers have complained about my website not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any ideas to help fix this problem? I am DERRICK in Louisville

February 3, 2013 at 12:00 am

just in case this last comment was *not* spam…

as seems unlikely… sure.

i have *one* such idea. stick to basic HTML.

and let the pros tackle the themes & designs

and whatnot.

anyhow, that’s the way i do it.

February 5, 2013 at 3:19 am

Have you ever considered publishing an e-book or guest authoring on other websites?

I have a blog centered on the same ideas you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information.

I know my subscribers would value your work. If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to send me an email. I ZACK I am from Beaumont

May 22, 2014 at 12:15 pm

Навеску сухого песка в сосуде заливают водой и выдерживают 2 ч, периодически перемешивая. Через 2 мин после перемешивания верхний слой воды над песком сливают, добавляют чистую воду и продолжают промывку песка, сливая загрязненную и песок доставка васильков добавляя чистую воду до тех пор, пока вода над песком после перемешивания не будет оставаться прозрачной.

November 9, 2014 at 2:06 am

В большинстве случаев нарушения эрекции и преждевременное семяизвержение не устранить с помощь волшебных слов или любовных средств (афродизиков). Для этого требуется специальная терапия под руководством опытных специалистов.

November 16, 2014 at 1:29 am

comment spam in russian about erectile dysfunction. now i know i’ve arrived.

July 1, 2016 at 1:05 am

[…] Aspects Of A Topic, Vlorbik on Math Ed argues the case for considering the formula for the length of a curve […]

July 1, 2016 at 7:18 pm

now, this: an old carny suddenly spotted years later

as a “pingback”. what hath arpanet wrought.